![]() Now since research points can be allocated to the tech tree of your choice, you can essentially “research rush” a specific force (land, sea, or air) and have an unbalanced, but tactically superior force in no time. Supreme commander 2 units wont attack series#While the game still looks great and on my iMac i7, never hiccupped even when engaged in full-scale battles with hundreds of units, it’s disappointing to see that the maps are generally smaller and the battle systems so genuinely altered.įor a series that is built on balance and flexibility, there are also some strange design choices that reduce your strategy options. Supreme Commander 2 cuts out many of the units from the first game, simplifies the research system, and even manages to reduce the scale all the while being less graphically complex. So, yes, fans of the series will be disappointed. Will the police be able to use it, for example, to conduct warrantless searches of political protesters’ homes to make sure they aren’t planning on violent behavior at their next political rally? The Supreme Court is going to take a very close look at this case and there is a good chance that it will overrule the lower court’s decision.It’s important to understand the back-story on the game because traditionally speaking, this is a series of games meant for a very specific, dedicated real time strategy audience. ![]() And the question of what sort of caretaking falls under this exception is extremely vague. Unlike the “exigent circumstances” and “emergency aid” exceptions, the community caretaking exception is not limited to circumstances where there is no time to apply for a warrant. And whatever one’s views on gun control may be, the Supreme Court has clearly held that the right to keep handguns in the home is at the core of the Second Amendment. The Fourth Amendment is supposed to protect the home above all other places. But they are also powerful agents of the government and their power is supposed to be restrained by the Bill of Rights. It is certainly true that the police need a good deal of discretion in carrying out their varied, complex, and sometimes dangerous duties. Threats to individual and community safety are not confined to the highways.” Understanding the core purpose of the doctrine leads inexorably to the conclusion that it should not be limited to the motor vehicle context. ![]() The court wrote: “At its core, the community caretaking doctrine is designed to give police elbow room to take appropriate action when unforeseen circumstances present some transient hazard that requires immediate attention. The 1st Circuit Court of Appeals (which is the federal court just below the Supreme Court in Caniglia’s jurisdiction) sided with the police. Caniglia sued for the violation of his Fourth Amendment right to privacy and his Second Amendment right to keep handguns in the home for self-protection. Caniglia’s consent to have the police search their home was legally negated because the police untruthfully told her that her husband had consented to the seizure of any guns.) The police located and seized the two guns. The police decided to search his home for the guns without obtaining a warrant. Caniglia told the police that her husband kept two handguns in the home. While he was on his way to the hospital, Mrs. Caniglia was acting “normal” or “agitated” but they convinced him to take an ambulance to the local hospital for evaluation. Caniglia was arguing with his wife and melodramatically put an unloaded gun on the table and said “shoot me now and get it over with.” His wife called a non-emergency number for the police who arrived shortly thereafter. ![]() ![]() The Court has just announced that it will hear arguments next month in a case that presents this issue: Caniglia v. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |